<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft Effort to Best Google Yields Results</title>
	<atom:link href="http://solution.allthingsd.com/20090602/microsoft-effort-to-best-google-yields-results/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://solution.allthingsd.com/20090602/microsoft-effort-to-best-google-yields-results/</link>
	<description>from The Wall Street Journal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 18:59:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: A Look Back at a Month of Binging</title>
		<link>http://solution.allthingsd.com/20090602/microsoft-effort-to-best-google-yields-results/comment-page-1/#comment-1531</link>
		<dc:creator>A Look Back at a Month of Binging</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 15:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://solution.allthingsd.com/20090602/microsoft-effort-to-best-google-yields-results/#comment-1531</guid>
		<description>[...] &#124; 8:46 AM PT &#124; 0 comments    Bing launched just over a month ago, to great fanfare and moderately good reviews. Now, it&#8217;s time to see if Microsoft has gotten anything for its massive ad budget and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] | 8:46 AM PT | 0 comments    Bing launched just over a month ago, to great fanfare and moderately good reviews. Now, it&#8217;s time to see if Microsoft has gotten anything for its massive ad budget and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean Baker</title>
		<link>http://solution.allthingsd.com/20090602/microsoft-effort-to-best-google-yields-results/comment-page-1/#comment-1441</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean Baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 18:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://solution.allthingsd.com/20090602/microsoft-effort-to-best-google-yields-results/#comment-1441</guid>
		<description>&quot;If DoJ lets them get away with such,...&quot;

Ah, yes, Big Brother knows best. Some bureaucrat, behind a desk in DC or Europe, who&#039;s sole goal is a bigger pay check –off taxpayers, should be the arbiter of &quot;proper&quot; competition. If businesses collude there are fraud statues to intervene, no other interference in business activity should be tolerated. Any other way, consumers lose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If DoJ lets them get away with such,&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Ah, yes, Big Brother knows best. Some bureaucrat, behind a desk in DC or Europe, who&#8217;s sole goal is a bigger pay check –off taxpayers, should be the arbiter of &#8220;proper&#8221; competition. If businesses collude there are fraud statues to intervene, no other interference in business activity should be tolerated. Any other way, consumers lose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mac Beach</title>
		<link>http://solution.allthingsd.com/20090602/microsoft-effort-to-best-google-yields-results/comment-page-1/#comment-1439</link>
		<dc:creator>Mac Beach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 22:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://solution.allthingsd.com/20090602/microsoft-effort-to-best-google-yields-results/#comment-1439</guid>
		<description>My guess is that where MS will fall down is on the cost of success in this area.   Their maps data was better than Google&#039;s for a while, they had aerial photos, but then Google went to the street level.  MS had closer satellite data in some spots too, but it often turned out to be older, or only in black and white.  MS had a pretty impressive book scanning operation going on there for a while too (also a better interface than Google&#039;s) but just as suddenly they got out of it.

Online services is such a different paradigm than stamping out laser engraved product activation paper (which is what MS&#039;s core business boils down to) that it&#039;s hard to imagine them carrying both business models forward.  At least not without a serious DoJ look-through.  Until there is a true competitor to Windows (and Apple doesn&#039;t quite qualify yet) I don&#039;t see how MS can afford to be seen as successful in services.  If DoJ lets them get away with such, they are surely being paid to look the other way.  In fact, this is almost certainly the case.  Doesn&#039;t seem to be working in Europe though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My guess is that where MS will fall down is on the cost of success in this area.   Their maps data was better than Google&#8217;s for a while, they had aerial photos, but then Google went to the street level.  MS had closer satellite data in some spots too, but it often turned out to be older, or only in black and white.  MS had a pretty impressive book scanning operation going on there for a while too (also a better interface than Google&#8217;s) but just as suddenly they got out of it.</p>
<p>Online services is such a different paradigm than stamping out laser engraved product activation paper (which is what MS&#8217;s core business boils down to) that it&#8217;s hard to imagine them carrying both business models forward.  At least not without a serious DoJ look-through.  Until there is a true competitor to Windows (and Apple doesn&#8217;t quite qualify yet) I don&#8217;t see how MS can afford to be seen as successful in services.  If DoJ lets them get away with such, they are surely being paid to look the other way.  In fact, this is almost certainly the case.  Doesn&#8217;t seem to be working in Europe though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Mitnick</title>
		<link>http://solution.allthingsd.com/20090602/microsoft-effort-to-best-google-yields-results/comment-page-1/#comment-1438</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Mitnick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 20:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://solution.allthingsd.com/20090602/microsoft-effort-to-best-google-yields-results/#comment-1438</guid>
		<description>Bing? Really now. Am I missing something?

No advanced search? No limiting the domain? No leaving out certian words?

Really!!

&gt;&gt;RSM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bing? Really now. Am I missing something?</p>
<p>No advanced search? No limiting the domain? No leaving out certian words?</p>
<p>Really!!</p>
<p>&gt;&gt;RSM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft Effort to Best Google Yields Results [The Mossberg Solution] &#124; POPULAR TECH NEWS</title>
		<link>http://solution.allthingsd.com/20090602/microsoft-effort-to-best-google-yields-results/comment-page-1/#comment-1435</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft Effort to Best Google Yields Results [The Mossberg Solution] &#124; POPULAR TECH NEWS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 09:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://solution.allthingsd.com/20090602/microsoft-effort-to-best-google-yields-results/#comment-1435</guid>
		<description>[...] Read more from the original source: Microsoft Effort to Best Google Yields Results [The Mossberg Solution] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read more from the original source: Microsoft Effort to Best Google Yields Results [The Mossberg Solution] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bing: It's cherry-licious &#124; Blog &#124; design mind</title>
		<link>http://solution.allthingsd.com/20090602/microsoft-effort-to-best-google-yields-results/comment-page-1/#comment-1434</link>
		<dc:creator>Bing: It's cherry-licious &#124; Blog &#124; design mind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 04:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://solution.allthingsd.com/20090602/microsoft-effort-to-best-google-yields-results/#comment-1434</guid>
		<description>[...] Katherine Boehret at WSJ has a write-up on the niceties of Bing, so I won&#039;t repeat them here. It does some things different than Google, breaking some ingrained habits, and while there isn&#039;t much that&#039;s significantly worse, there is quite a bit that is considerably better. The results that come back are somewhat different, sometimes more on target, sometimes not, I&#039;d say the jury&#039;s out on that, especially since this is a just-launched service (assuming it&#039;s not just a re-skin of Live, I don&#039;t know what&#039;s under the hood), and assuming it will improve as users contribute with clicks. (Like Google, it lists this blog as the top search when I self-search, so that&#039;s a plus.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Katherine Boehret at WSJ has a write-up on the niceties of Bing, so I won&#8217;t repeat them here. It does some things different than Google, breaking some ingrained habits, and while there isn&#8217;t much that&#8217;s significantly worse, there is quite a bit that is considerably better. The results that come back are somewhat different, sometimes more on target, sometimes not, I&#8217;d say the jury&#8217;s out on that, especially since this is a just-launched service (assuming it&#8217;s not just a re-skin of Live, I don&#8217;t know what&#8217;s under the hood), and assuming it will improve as users contribute with clicks. (Like Google, it lists this blog as the top search when I self-search, so that&#8217;s a plus.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft Effort to Best Google Yields Results [The Mossberg Solution] &#124; techclack.com</title>
		<link>http://solution.allthingsd.com/20090602/microsoft-effort-to-best-google-yields-results/comment-page-1/#comment-1432</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft Effort to Best Google Yields Results [The Mossberg Solution] &#124; techclack.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 03:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://solution.allthingsd.com/20090602/microsoft-effort-to-best-google-yields-results/#comment-1432</guid>
		<description>[...] the original here:  Microsoft Effort to Best Google Yields Results [The Mossberg Solution]    var AdBrite_Title_Color = &#039;0000FF&#039;; var AdBrite_Text_Color = &#039;000000&#039;; var [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the original here:  Microsoft Effort to Best Google Yields Results [The Mossberg Solution]    var AdBrite_Title_Color = &#8216;0000FF&#8217;; var AdBrite_Text_Color = &#8216;000000&#8242;; var [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft Effort to Best Google Yields Results [The Mossberg Solution] &#124; The Absolute Best Hamburger &#38; Ground Beef Recipes Blog</title>
		<link>http://solution.allthingsd.com/20090602/microsoft-effort-to-best-google-yields-results/comment-page-1/#comment-1431</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft Effort to Best Google Yields Results [The Mossberg Solution] &#124; The Absolute Best Hamburger &#38; Ground Beef Recipes Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 02:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://solution.allthingsd.com/20090602/microsoft-effort-to-best-google-yields-results/#comment-1431</guid>
		<description>[...] Original post: Microsoft Effort to Best Google Yields Results [The Mossberg Solution] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Original post: Microsoft Effort to Best Google Yields Results [The Mossberg Solution] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>